know is curious.
uncomfortable I decided to write a post about each other Baptists.
Before doing so I tried to search the web for documentation of the material, given the confusion that reigns in this area.
What better than the record of the trial, for example?
From there it goes to the root of the story I thought and I can overtake the momentum of the positions which are defined as "ideological."
Well it's interesting, because I have not found.
I even found a page on the trial of Cesare Battisti true, the patriot, in 1916 complete with a death sentence, found here , out of curiosity, but the trial records to contemporary Baptists even the shadow.
There are many commentaries and glosses to the acts themselves.
Anyone following the story is more accurately without a doubt the site Carmilla.
Carmilla, however, is a site with a connotation politician / ideological very precise, thus leaves the doubt that you have selected the contradictions of the ruling for its own use.
Spataro instead (I think the PM process to Battisti) is guilty of excesses opposites. Make a portrait of the accused so hard that it makes me doubt some of its prevention are equally strong. It was a first line in the fight against the 70 armed subversion. Even then its a case could be tainted by a personal vision.
Then I see on television an interview with the butcher's son killed (one of the four murders of which he is accused Baptists) and I hear that Baptists recognized among the killers of his father. Wow, I think. It was therefore an eyewitness? I do not know why I can not find the record of the trial.
Torregiani son instead (Torregiani was the jewel of Milan, who was killed in one of the robberies discussed in the process) was affected in the fact by a stray bullet shot by his father, did you know?
According to Carmilla then, Battisti is indicated by two repentant gunman.
Here pentitismo assured at the time the reduction of sentences. Carmilla obviously insinuates that for this reason the two, already caught the blame on the only fugitive. This makes the evidence less reliable or not? Were removed during the process or have held?
I do not know again, why do not I find the acts of the process and I can not give me an idea of \u200b\u200bmine ...
Complicating the issue then there are other tangential;
Battisti was tried in the context of these special laws to combat terrorism laws that greatly heightened the penalties if the offenses were in fact related subversion. Many argue therefore that the penalties were excessive in Battisti precisely because born in that context. But they seem excessive now. You must understand if they looked like when Aldo Moro was held prisoner in the hideout of the Red Brigades and there were those who called for the reintroduction of the sentence death (The Republicans, not just Missini.).
The short context counts.
And then again Spataro contends that Battisti was convicted serial killer because that's all.
to create more confusion then weighs the politicization of Baptists happened in prison, making him a common criminal who becomes "subversive politics" in a climate in which the "proletarian expropriation" was a act purely political act and the boundaries between delinquent and subversive gesture is made thin.
A figure then ideologically ambiguous to Baptists, like other prisoners or Segio Curcio, who still a confrontational interview with institutions engaged in some way.
Battisti, no, he just runs away. In his "The worst youth then Mughini dismisses it as" poor and the poor cock he jerks his fellow adventurers! A character like that, it goes without saying, is elected to a worse symbol of those years by many moderate intelligentsia.
Finally, I cite the arrogance of the French intellectuals who treat it as a "revolutionary" (their words) persecuted by the Italian Government. Adding confusion to confusion.
where I wanted to get there? I wanted to get to the fact that the story Battisti is very complicated, very opaque, with much food for thought.
But the current debate is not about the deeds and misdeeds.
but on opinions that any part of such political and cultural deeds and misdeeds.
And if someone tries hard to form your own idea, trying to access the sources, who else can not be unless the pleadings, (Of course, immersed in the historical context) here is that these sources are unavailable.
With all due respect the democracy of the network, which enables you to read cablegrams of a U.S. ambassador to Costa Rica but does not give me the decision process Battisti.
E 'which does not give anyone .... Neither advocates nor critics, committed as they are to use to its advantage, as the scribe stronzissimi modern, these valuable data.
So I can not write a post about each other Baptists.
I have to write a post about how those who have information in hand (the black gold of the network) is the story Battisti.
I have to surf between innocent and guilty, among pundits of the 70 year history, when everything was primitive magma, chaos, revolution and the upcoming trials "bourgeois farce" and justice-hard for which a sentence is like a diamond, transparent and scratch-resistant, which should be taken as it is. Manco had a reading of the Sibyl Cumana.
short, I understand that there are four (well 4) murder, which was judged accused, including Baptists.
Here, the two camps that have formed around each other, do not agree on anything and say anything about the role that Baptists had in these four murders.
This is because of my research, the state of affairs.
contrary opinions.
the searcher
0 comments:
Post a Comment