Thursday, March 3, 2011

Schema President Jackson

how we become cynical


know in my profession, that is to do video, spent a lot of time trying to be nice to everyone. With the customer, with the fitter, an electrician, with the studio with "fuck you if you care" (the quotation is HERE). He spends so much time trying to be truly proactive, proactive sincerely, honestly anything that sometimes you lose your sense of reality. Yesterday I felt like a light that cynicism is this. Not the caricature films, in which people with the lip folded despise everything. But what's real everyday life, in which one endeavors to appreciate all efforts are made to feel so much empathy for stupid things to be emptied. Because the game requires that the parties, because the structure (even the famous Marxist superstructure!) Means that my client says in mock embarrassment "I know you hate me for all these changes and you must meet sweet" but no matter! It 's normal, it's work, you are looking for the best product possible! " and perhaps the cynicism is knowing that what you are responding in part is true, that you believe in the abstract but it is extremely exhausting from the truth. And this makes you mad with frustration.
now work modern service requires not only the "delivery" (delivery) on time. Obliged to do any changes and meet possible outcome, winning mix of carrots and sticks with skill and craft, cajoled and threatened, in an ongoing game of emotional strength that must be performed with matchless skill, remains (and should) always happy and motivated. Deeply involved in the effort that the customer makes.
The class struggle was great because it lets you do your job and keep the bad mood. But today, the great tragedy of insecurity is that everyone must also seem happy: call-center operators, PR, press officers, communication experts. You're not selling a brick wall, pulled up to the letter, you can conclude that even a grunt, so has the wall. No, here process by which you build your wall, (now become the subject intangible) is part product you sell. If you turn a good video and you're in a bad mood, you're not a good director. If the event went very well but you were long the bagpipes, you are not a good Pr
Today we all sell fake happiness ready cash. And we also sell poorly.
Basically today we can no longer just work, work we are happy to share a "mission" a "goal" of our customers and make them feel deep empathy for our his filmatino that airs the week of fashion.
And I tell you.
He says he is an Italian philosopher in Paris. His name is Michael Marzano, his book "domain extension of manipulation" talk about that. In short, as we pretend that everything is important, while we know that few things really are.
And then pretend for too long is harmful. Understand that if you're evoking empathy in yourself (as an actor in the Actor's Studio itself can cause a "real" feeling) is fake or real, leads to confound the plans in an antechamber of schizophrenia that is uncomfortable. And since
feel empathy for those who do not have to, not who you should try for more.
Here are cynical. Use feelings just the wrong way.
I'm careful and I still cry in front of good movies.
But it's not that I did not happen sooner or later.
If you notice.



the searcher


Magnum and the photo is found here

Schema President Jackson

how we become cynical


know in my profession, that is to do video, spent a lot of time trying to be nice to everyone. With the customer, with the fitter, an electrician, with the studio with "fuck you if you care" (the quotation is HERE). He spends so much time trying to be truly proactive, proactive sincerely, honestly anything that sometimes you lose your sense of reality. Yesterday I felt like a light that cynicism is this. Not the caricature films, in which people with the lip folded despise everything. But what's real everyday life, in which one endeavors to appreciate all efforts are made to feel so much empathy for stupid things to be emptied. Because the game requires that the parties, because the structure (even the famous Marxist superstructure!) Means that my client says in mock embarrassment "I know you hate me for all these changes and you must meet sweet" but no matter! It 's normal, it's work, you are looking for the best product possible! " and perhaps the cynicism is knowing that what you are responding in part is true, that you believe in the abstract but it is extremely exhausting from the truth. And this makes you mad with frustration.
now work modern service requires not only the "delivery" (delivery) on time. Obliged to do any changes and meet possible outcome, winning mix of carrots and sticks with skill and craft, cajoled and threatened, in an ongoing game of emotional strength that must be performed with matchless skill, remains (and should) always happy and motivated. Deeply involved in the effort that the customer makes.
The class struggle was great because it lets you do your job and keep the bad mood. But today, the great tragedy of insecurity is that everyone must also seem happy: call-center operators, PR, press officers, communication experts. You're not selling a brick wall, pulled up to the letter, you can conclude that even a grunt, so has the wall. No, here process by which you build your wall, (now become the subject intangible) is part product you sell. If you turn a good video and you're in a bad mood, you're not a good director. If the event went very well but you were long the bagpipes, you are not a good Pr
Today we all sell fake happiness ready cash. And we also sell poorly.
Basically today we can no longer just work, work we are happy to share a "mission" a "goal" of our customers and make them feel deep empathy for our his filmatino that airs the week of fashion.
And I tell you.
He says he is an Italian philosopher in Paris. His name is Michael Marzano, his book "domain extension of manipulation" talk about that. In short, as we pretend that everything is important, while we know that few things really are.
And then pretend for too long is harmful. Understand that if you're evoking empathy in yourself (as an actor in the Actor's Studio itself can cause a "real" feeling) is fake or real, leads to confound the plans in an antechamber of schizophrenia that is uncomfortable. And since
feel empathy for those who do not have to, not who you should try for more.
Here are cynical. Use feelings just the wrong way.
I'm careful and I still cry in front of good movies.
But it's not that I did not happen sooner or later.
If you notice.



the searcher


Magnum and the photo is found here

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Used Paramotor Engines

thanks for flowers



The analysis of Sanremo this year were very much political or ideological.
It seems a wrong approach, Sanremo is not a meeting, or (only) a festival of song. Sanremo is primarily a television show, the basic tenet of Rai plays one for the whole season and in this context should be evaluated.

I try ...

Morandi I think this year it worked because it gave the musicians a sense of being understood, understood, accompanied by someone who knows how they feel. Assured fact. This identification is also very pleased to viewers. The educated public has appreciated a snob and artist who has been credible and station for many years and has accepted the challenge in the arena of rhetoric, the most sempice and mass followed sanremo because it always follows. That's why the ratings were good. At the hard core has been added to an audience that he felt "duty paid" by the presence of Morandi.
Technically, the festival was a disaster .... and success ... Morandi and his team have strung together a number of errors, wrong entries, forget about the move, communicate anxiety at any time, go to the doll, the hunchback look too electronic. But there is this inability made him feel (Morandi) closer and more real. Very in tune with the "people show" that now patrol the TV. Ordinary people who do abnormal things. And so we felt it.
do not share the enthusiasm for Luke and Paul. The form that they invented is now codified in their two and a half in which they say pussy of all colors, or the duet with luca paolo shoulder playing on pro quo here. In fact, they worked well when they targeted the two co-presenters, much less well with the songs, really weak.
Interviews were undoubtedly (and directed) the horrible black hole of the festival. The Bellucci appears as Queen Margot was hounded out of his soul for tiaras and Italian commoner, the Morandi has dealt in between the erotic dream and Queen Margot precisely. And she has been in plaster as a princess visiting Papua for the first and last time.
Andy Garcia who strums the piano and a song out of place in Cuba is the ultimate icon of the tragic and eternal Nosrati provincialism. De Niro only quote an exchange between Morandi and canalis: Morandi "bellissmi film! Raging Bull, Taxi Driver, as a means taxi driver?" and Canalis "Taxi driver ..." perfect.
The director was one of the worst ever, and I wonder who the fine recommended (because this will be of course) who have been entrusted. The directorial style is exhausted in these two options: Total range / two / Total / Field two / total field to two. Woody, banal, with the cameraman lasica impression of themselves. Apotheosis of the number of tango. Number too large that does not understand what's happening, details of the foot and lose all the sensuality of the movement of bodies. Congratulations my dear
recommended. Now disappear. Sanremo
repeat that is television and music. E 'with this view that art should be judged on the casting that is always looking a perfect synthesis of the various souls who sit in front of the TV.
The elderly (and not very educated in the south, I might add), are a significant part of the plays of raiuno and are then backed the ban, Anna Tatangelo and designers who actually represent the bel canto harmless that hints at claudio villa and much like our grandparents (in fact the singer has defined "master" Al Bano), continued to another age of the children that horrible show with singers gorgeggiano "Granada."
A sprinkling of alternatives with Luca Madonia and Crush, the music copyright for former '78ini seasoned with Vecchioni, which gives us a song so horribly didactic and easy wins, the star of the talent show, the real engine televoting (friends ex factor) and because Emma, \u200b\u200bgiusy ferreri and Nathalie.
Some dogs loose labels stubbornly recur in the hope that rediscover the old magic and ancient collections, Oxa and Patty Pravo (If the ailing right Bertè worth two) and "white" that makes you feel clean Spectators career (Tricarico) acoltelliamo back so when a colleague know that the purity in the world still exists thanks to him. The presence of the alloy allows the government to clear that Van de Sfroos to be fair it was cleared by just finding its audience in the great north.
As you can see each category is thoroughly covered. The ecumenism of Sanremo is a need for the plays and the revenues of the week.
Guests. The technique for which the data € benign are actually an investment that earns 4 times I refer to this POST .
The voting mechanism was interesting. 2 days of jury opinion poll that they have killed the dinosaurs and two days of televoting who received the nazionalpopolare center stage.
Tatangelo Albano and the first day, and Patty Pravo Oxa the second.
Sanremo expels the old man with infinite slowness. The year he wore a Carmen Consoli sanremo "confused and happy," Riccardo Fogli loomed miss was Bryan Ferry. If you want a window space-time on the past, often Sanremo is that window. The
televoting has rescued so characters who are the idols of the mass public. Anna Tatangelo and Al Bano and lost for Oxa and Patty Pravo that could not be found because they are in a no man's land.
conclude with the case of two co-conductive.
say what they all say, started to devote his uncle's girlfriend Hurley of America, proud that Clooney had chosen one of our compatriot and ready to crucify the whore with argentina boyfriend unpresentable.
We found ourselves faced with a reversal worthy of '60s comedy, the likes and dislikes, and vice versa. Belen who loves family, who can dance and sing not bad at all, but especially in Belen who manages an art that wins the masses of viewers relentlessly, or seem to be authentic .
Television is a strange thing. Party to lie, it does so manic and structured and yet some remnant of reality comes along and upsets all plans. Or maybe it's a lie so well built by come to believe in herself and become truth as in certain films Almodovar.




the searcher

Used Paramotor Engines

thanks for flowers



The analysis of Sanremo this year were very much political or ideological.
It seems a wrong approach, Sanremo is not a meeting, or (only) a festival of song. Sanremo is primarily a television show, the basic tenet of Rai plays one for the whole season and in this context should be evaluated.

I try ...

Morandi I think this year it worked because it gave the musicians a sense of being understood, understood, accompanied by someone who knows how they feel. Assured fact. This identification is also very pleased to viewers. The educated public has appreciated a snob and artist who has been credible and station for many years and has accepted the challenge in the arena of rhetoric, the most sempice and mass followed sanremo because it always follows. That's why the ratings were good. At the hard core has been added to an audience that he felt "duty paid" by the presence of Morandi.
Technically, the festival was a disaster .... and success ... Morandi and his team have strung together a number of errors, wrong entries, forget about the move, communicate anxiety at any time, go to the doll, the hunchback look too electronic. But there is this inability made him feel (Morandi) closer and more real. Very in tune with the "people show" that now patrol the TV. Ordinary people who do abnormal things. And so we felt it.
do not share the enthusiasm for Luke and Paul. The form that they invented is now codified in their two and a half in which they say pussy of all colors, or the duet with luca paolo shoulder playing on pro quo here. In fact, they worked well when they targeted the two co-presenters, much less well with the songs, really weak.
Interviews were undoubtedly (and directed) the horrible black hole of the festival. The Bellucci appears as Queen Margot was hounded out of his soul for tiaras and Italian commoner, the Morandi has dealt in between the erotic dream and Queen Margot precisely. And she has been in plaster as a princess visiting Papua for the first and last time.
Andy Garcia who strums the piano and a song out of place in Cuba is the ultimate icon of the tragic and eternal Nosrati provincialism. De Niro only quote an exchange between Morandi and canalis: Morandi "bellissmi film! Raging Bull, Taxi Driver, as a means taxi driver?" and Canalis "Taxi driver ..." perfect.
The director was one of the worst ever, and I wonder who the fine recommended (because this will be of course) who have been entrusted. The directorial style is exhausted in these two options: Total range / two / Total / Field two / total field to two. Woody, banal, with the cameraman lasica impression of themselves. Apotheosis of the number of tango. Number too large that does not understand what's happening, details of the foot and lose all the sensuality of the movement of bodies. Congratulations my dear
recommended. Now disappear. Sanremo
repeat that is television and music. E 'with this view that art should be judged on the casting that is always looking a perfect synthesis of the various souls who sit in front of the TV.
The elderly (and not very educated in the south, I might add), are a significant part of the plays of raiuno and are then backed the ban, Anna Tatangelo and designers who actually represent the bel canto harmless that hints at claudio villa and much like our grandparents (in fact the singer has defined "master" Al Bano), continued to another age of the children that horrible show with singers gorgeggiano "Granada."
A sprinkling of alternatives with Luca Madonia and Crush, the music copyright for former '78ini seasoned with Vecchioni, which gives us a song so horribly didactic and easy wins, the star of the talent show, the real engine televoting (friends ex factor) and because Emma, \u200b\u200bgiusy ferreri and Nathalie.
Some dogs loose labels stubbornly recur in the hope that rediscover the old magic and ancient collections, Oxa and Patty Pravo (If the ailing right Bertè worth two) and "white" that makes you feel clean Spectators career (Tricarico) acoltelliamo back so when a colleague know that the purity in the world still exists thanks to him. The presence of the alloy allows the government to clear that Van de Sfroos to be fair it was cleared by just finding its audience in the great north.
As you can see each category is thoroughly covered. The ecumenism of Sanremo is a need for the plays and the revenues of the week.
Guests. The technique for which the data € benign are actually an investment that earns 4 times I refer to this POST .
The voting mechanism was interesting. 2 days of jury opinion poll that they have killed the dinosaurs and two days of televoting who received the nazionalpopolare center stage.
Tatangelo Albano and the first day, and Patty Pravo Oxa the second.
Sanremo expels the old man with infinite slowness. The year he wore a Carmen Consoli sanremo "confused and happy," Riccardo Fogli loomed miss was Bryan Ferry. If you want a window space-time on the past, often Sanremo is that window. The
televoting has rescued so characters who are the idols of the mass public. Anna Tatangelo and Al Bano and lost for Oxa and Patty Pravo that could not be found because they are in a no man's land.
conclude with the case of two co-conductive.
say what they all say, started to devote his uncle's girlfriend Hurley of America, proud that Clooney had chosen one of our compatriot and ready to crucify the whore with argentina boyfriend unpresentable.
We found ourselves faced with a reversal worthy of '60s comedy, the likes and dislikes, and vice versa. Belen who loves family, who can dance and sing not bad at all, but especially in Belen who manages an art that wins the masses of viewers relentlessly, or seem to be authentic .
Television is a strange thing. Party to lie, it does so manic and structured and yet some remnant of reality comes along and upsets all plans. Or maybe it's a lie so well built by come to believe in herself and become truth as in certain films Almodovar.




the searcher

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Ankle Ligament Reconstruction

secularism à la carte



this battle is interesting secular Giuliano Ferrara strokes of underpants.
Ferrara speaks of private behavior, sexual and moral habits that should not affect a state, why stick to the personal choices.
call to war against the new Puritanism ... tones from "ordinary man", in essence, not rompeteci his balls ...
agree on everything, please. It 's amazing, however, as it allows Ferrara intercepted triple ideological (with the wheels then ..) that are denied to others.
speak of that fact that Ferrara called for a new Puritanism (with another name) in his holy war against abortion.
them is a secular state leaves the step and quickly, in a moral, moralissimo.
Because for the secular state, the woman should be free to choose their own behavior, in fact. To state therefore, a fetus of a few weeks is a molecular structure that can not yet call a human being, this provides a difficult but essential step for a national freedom, the woman, who decides what to do. For Catholics, rather than possibility of human being (the fetus) is still man and its preservation should be ensured at all costs. What is secular and what neo Puritan Ferrara in these two cases?
Ferrara is also the sponsor intellectual and heard "adviser to the Prince" by a government that has undermined the stem, which does not even want to hear about civil unions.
I wonder whether these choices are not neopuritanesimo nth degree, interventions in sexual and moral habits (all right) people.
If I'm wrong and I can not marry a same-sex partners, at my bedside he literally has no right of access. I mean that in intensive care, if you are not husband or wife of someone you do not make us go.
Here's another question, the emergency room is a private space where inside is between life and death, the person we love or not?
on these questions more fundamental and painful of course, the private parties, I would expect a high debate from Ferrara, who has the intellectual and moral weapons.
His secularism à la carte instead is convenient;
cost much more, but eat only what you want.


the searcher

Ankle Ligament Reconstruction

secularism à la carte



this battle is interesting secular Giuliano Ferrara strokes of underpants.
Ferrara speaks of private behavior, sexual and moral habits that should not affect a state, why stick to the personal choices.
call to war against the new Puritanism ... tones from "ordinary man", in essence, not rompeteci his balls ...
agree on everything, please. It 's amazing, however, as it allows Ferrara intercepted triple ideological (with the wheels then ..) that are denied to others.
speak of that fact that Ferrara called for a new Puritanism (with another name) in his holy war against abortion.
them is a secular state leaves the step and quickly, in a moral, moralissimo.
Because for the secular state, the woman should be free to choose their own behavior, in fact. To state therefore, a fetus of a few weeks is a molecular structure that can not yet call a human being, this provides a difficult but essential step for a national freedom, the woman, who decides what to do. For Catholics, rather than possibility of human being (the fetus) is still man and its preservation should be ensured at all costs. What is secular and what neo Puritan Ferrara in these two cases?
Ferrara is also the sponsor intellectual and heard "adviser to the Prince" by a government that has undermined the stem, which does not even want to hear about civil unions.
I wonder whether these choices are not neopuritanesimo nth degree, interventions in sexual and moral habits (all right) people.
If I'm wrong and I can not marry a same-sex partners, at my bedside he literally has no right of access. I mean that in intensive care, if you are not husband or wife of someone you do not make us go.
Here's another question, the emergency room is a private space where inside is between life and death, the person we love or not?
on these questions more fundamental and painful of course, the private parties, I would expect a high debate from Ferrara, who has the intellectual and moral weapons.
His secularism à la carte instead is convenient;
cost much more, but eat only what you want.


the searcher

Monday, February 14, 2011

School Engineering Club

Sheikh



The White Sheik is a great movie by Federico Fellini. We
after the war, a girl from the province, honeymoon in Rome, runs away from the hotel to meet the star of the soap operas of his dreams. The actor, a master of cynicism is deaf in the character and charms the naive bride until the arrival of his wife. There, the mask falls. Deaf And shows his pettiness.

Berlusconi this time makes me think of him. I believe that Berlusconi
like now to only two categories of people: Those
very cynical and very white ones.
I think of the opposing reactions of some girls to dinner at Arcore. Those who understand very well why they are there and what they believed to really be at a political meeting. The first adapt on the fly, the second disappointment, the crack of the myth is deep and painful.

If you have a further blow (not a moral or criminal, if anything, policy) is precisely that they had destroyed a narrative to which many young people have believed. A narrative perhaps superficial, a little plastic-, some 80s, but an idea of \u200b\u200bItaly and Italians, who liked it or not.
imagine the faces of good guys who study, ordered by the forelock, tie and blue shirt that we see in certain sites of the PDL, and I've seen in some events. Here
've somehow betrayed this generation is a fault on which he should ask.
Building a fictional young clean, respectful of parents, good school graduates facing the country and change it and then fuck those same young people is not a pretty sight. And 'in fact, a deafening silence is that of young talent Berlusconi, although there are clubs.

'm not so sure that this country is drowning in cynicism. And I do not think that the PDL did not have the ideal structure. Some students of the Catholic or mouthfuls of Milan, who saw him as the successful businessman, the father or the uncle who would have liked. I think for them, even if they are not huge crowds, there is the inconvenience. A
that generation certainly can not talk anymore after what has happened and the interruption of dialogue with "good for young people" at the end is a political mistake no small feat.
I wonder if this "collateral damage" is evaluating the Berlusconi.

School Engineering Club

Sheikh



The White Sheik is a great movie by Federico Fellini. We
after the war, a girl from the province, honeymoon in Rome, runs away from the hotel to meet the star of the soap operas of his dreams. The actor, a master of cynicism is deaf in the character and charms the naive bride until the arrival of his wife. There, the mask falls. Deaf And shows his pettiness.

Berlusconi this time makes me think of him. I believe that Berlusconi
like now to only two categories of people: Those
very cynical and very white ones.
I think of the opposing reactions of some girls to dinner at Arcore. Those who understand very well why they are there and what they believed to really be at a political meeting. The first adapt on the fly, the second disappointment, the crack of the myth is deep and painful.

If you have a further blow (not a moral or criminal, if anything, policy) is precisely that they had destroyed a narrative to which many young people have believed. A narrative perhaps superficial, a little plastic-, some 80s, but an idea of \u200b\u200bItaly and Italians, who liked it or not.
imagine the faces of good guys who study, ordered by the forelock, tie and blue shirt that we see in certain sites of the PDL, and I've seen in some events. Here
've somehow betrayed this generation is a fault on which he should ask.
Building a fictional young clean, respectful of parents, good school graduates facing the country and change it and then fuck those same young people is not a pretty sight. And 'in fact, a deafening silence is that of young talent Berlusconi, although there are clubs.

'm not so sure that this country is drowning in cynicism. And I do not think that the PDL did not have the ideal structure. Some students of the Catholic or mouthfuls of Milan, who saw him as the successful businessman, the father or the uncle who would have liked. I think for them, even if they are not huge crowds, there is the inconvenience. A
that generation certainly can not talk anymore after what has happened and the interruption of dialogue with "good for young people" at the end is a political mistake no small feat.
I wonder if this "collateral damage" is evaluating the Berlusconi.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Are Bb Pellets Illegal In Australia

The White Working Class Goes to Heaven?




Mirafiori is not just a factory.
We all know that.
Mirafiori is as the birthplace of Manzoni, and the Racalmuto Sciascia, the compass of Viareggio, Custoza or the hills of Chianti.
Mirafiori is a place in the history of Italy, neither more nor less.
And when it comes to Mirafiori (I did for a job) is like entering the colosseum or the Milan Cathedral. You enter a place whose suggestions you still stick with him infinite power. Here
because what is happening at Mirafiori is a time not of our social history. But our
S tory period.
The idea that no more openings Worker those gates, which in the long boulevards internal roll litter blowing in the wind. Not hear the voices of more people and the clatter of the machines I think is simply unbearable. Because there's a piece of identity in this country. I understand that this
incipit may seem a romantic ode to the work lost (lost?
....) But I think the problem is in the net and a different perception of Mirafiori Marchionne compared to Italy and I think the same lambs. For the fiat
AD Mirafiori is indeed just a factory. If it does not produce at affordable cost you close it and go elsewhere to produce. For many Italians, however
Mirafiori is the place that I just described.
And many would like to see this place continue to live. And as a museum, or converted to falk obscenely as it happens in Sesto San Giovanni, but as a place of real work, because it represents a part of Italian living and real and therefore we want to.
So the battle is not just about fees or costs, but also based on social reasons, historic and, dare I say, romantic.
It is no coincidence that a manager more Swiss than Italian, training basically U.S. has come to strive so extreme the relationship between Fiat and Italy.
Nesusn Italian manager would know to be so cruel in dealing with the problem. At no Italian manager, would escape the symbolic dimension of the problem.
Mirafiori you are the workers who cross their arms in the face of fascism, it is the dawn of the 70 fliers, they are also the march of 40,000, re-founding document of the dignity of Italian management. Indeed
Luca Cordero di Montezemolo, that this issue captures it deep, glossy shine for his silence ....
and add trade union. Residing in the city has built much of its identity and history.
camusso there is also anger in the anger of a sindaclaista he feels outraged the absolute centrality of Mirafiori. In his words I see the frustration of having to explain to a "master" the unspeakable; Mirafiori is not one of the many areas on which we fight the battle for industrial relations.
Mirafiori E 'the playing field. The real and imaginary place in which the relations between trade unions, industry, labor, companies were born in this country. It would be as close Sansiro claiming to want to continue playing football. Two
sidereal worlds away, that you do not understand. Marchionne with his pragmatism is a blasphemer for camusso and camusso Marchionne seems the fallout of a nineteenth-century history book.

Which item is missing from this debate?
The peak of this triangle property. The Agnelli family.
That should say loud and clear (and so some hint of national pride john Elkan expresses it ..) and Mirafiori is not only a place of production, but also a place of the identity . They like this never, ever quits. That workers who join the morning mist from those gates are a permanent landscape of this city and this country as much as the decline in Posillipo.
A landscape that simply can not be deleted, and that, above all, defies logic optimization of production. Or
.
declare that for them (not hiding behind a manager "atheist") Mirafiori is now only a token as another. That the Copernican system of fiat, which lasted one hundred years, has now become the Ptolemaic.

And in the end, all this disappears beautiful analysis summarized in the simple gesture and poignant that today we saw the gates of Mirafiori.
a worker who is crying.




the searcher


ps
no upper or lower case
of this post is a spelling error.

Are Bb Pellets Illegal In Australia

The White Working Class Goes to Heaven?




Mirafiori is not just a factory.
We all know that.
Mirafiori is as the birthplace of Manzoni, and the Racalmuto Sciascia, the compass of Viareggio, Custoza or the hills of Chianti.
Mirafiori is a place in the history of Italy, neither more nor less.
And when it comes to Mirafiori (I did for a job) is like entering the colosseum or the Milan Cathedral. You enter a place whose suggestions you still stick with him infinite power. Here
because what is happening at Mirafiori is a time not of our social history. But our
S tory period.
The idea that no more openings Worker those gates, which in the long boulevards internal roll litter blowing in the wind. Not hear the voices of more people and the clatter of the machines I think is simply unbearable. Because there's a piece of identity in this country. I understand that this
incipit may seem a romantic ode to the work lost (lost?
....) But I think the problem is in the net and a different perception of Mirafiori Marchionne compared to Italy and I think the same lambs. For the fiat
AD Mirafiori is indeed just a factory. If it does not produce at affordable cost you close it and go elsewhere to produce. For many Italians, however
Mirafiori is the place that I just described.
And many would like to see this place continue to live. And as a museum, or converted to falk obscenely as it happens in Sesto San Giovanni, but as a place of real work, because it represents a part of Italian living and real and therefore we want to.
So the battle is not just about fees or costs, but also based on social reasons, historic and, dare I say, romantic.
It is no coincidence that a manager more Swiss than Italian, training basically U.S. has come to strive so extreme the relationship between Fiat and Italy.
Nesusn Italian manager would know to be so cruel in dealing with the problem. At no Italian manager, would escape the symbolic dimension of the problem.
Mirafiori you are the workers who cross their arms in the face of fascism, it is the dawn of the 70 fliers, they are also the march of 40,000, re-founding document of the dignity of Italian management. Indeed
Luca Cordero di Montezemolo, that this issue captures it deep, glossy shine for his silence ....
and add trade union. Residing in the city has built much of its identity and history.
camusso there is also anger in the anger of a sindaclaista he feels outraged the absolute centrality of Mirafiori. In his words I see the frustration of having to explain to a "master" the unspeakable; Mirafiori is not one of the many areas on which we fight the battle for industrial relations.
Mirafiori E 'the playing field. The real and imaginary place in which the relations between trade unions, industry, labor, companies were born in this country. It would be as close Sansiro claiming to want to continue playing football. Two
sidereal worlds away, that you do not understand. Marchionne with his pragmatism is a blasphemer for camusso and camusso Marchionne seems the fallout of a nineteenth-century history book.

Which item is missing from this debate?
The peak of this triangle property. The Agnelli family.
That should say loud and clear (and so some hint of national pride john Elkan expresses it ..) and Mirafiori is not only a place of production, but also a place of the identity . They like this never, ever quits. That workers who join the morning mist from those gates are a permanent landscape of this city and this country as much as the decline in Posillipo.
A landscape that simply can not be deleted, and that, above all, defies logic optimization of production. Or
.
declare that for them (not hiding behind a manager "atheist") Mirafiori is now only a token as another. That the Copernican system of fiat, which lasted one hundred years, has now become the Ptolemaic.

And in the end, all this disappears beautiful analysis summarized in the simple gesture and poignant that today we saw the gates of Mirafiori.
a worker who is crying.




the searcher


ps
no upper or lower case
of this post is a spelling error.

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Steam South Park On You Iphone

the disappearance of (mis)




know is curious.
uncomfortable I decided to write a post about each other Baptists.
Before doing so I tried to search the web for documentation of the material, given the confusion that reigns in this area.
What better than the record of the trial, for example?
From there it goes to the root of the story I thought and I can overtake the momentum of the positions which are defined as "ideological."
Well it's interesting, because I have not found.
I even found a page on the trial of Cesare Battisti true, the patriot, in 1916 complete with a death sentence, found here , out of curiosity, but the trial records to contemporary Baptists even the shadow.
There are many commentaries and glosses to the acts themselves.
Anyone following the story is more accurately without a doubt the site Carmilla.
here find the page that I could read more detail about the process.
Carmilla, however, is a site with a connotation politician / ideological very precise, thus leaves the doubt that you have selected the contradictions of the ruling for its own use.
Spataro instead (I think the PM process to Battisti) is guilty of excesses opposites. Make a portrait of the accused so hard that it makes me doubt some of its prevention are equally strong. It was a first line in the fight against the 70 armed subversion. Even then its a case could be tainted by a personal vision.
Then I see on television an interview with the butcher's son killed (one of the four murders of which he is accused Baptists) and I hear that Baptists recognized among the killers of his father. Wow, I think. It was therefore an eyewitness? I do not know why I can not find the record of the trial.
Torregiani son instead (Torregiani was the jewel of Milan, who was killed in one of the robberies discussed in the process) was affected in the fact by a stray bullet shot by his father, did you know?
According to Carmilla then, Battisti is indicated by two repentant gunman.
Here pentitismo assured at the time the reduction of sentences. Carmilla obviously insinuates that for this reason the two, already caught the blame on the only fugitive. This makes the evidence less reliable or not? Were removed during the process or have held?
I do not know again, why do not I find the acts of the process and I can not give me an idea of \u200b\u200bmine ...
Complicating the issue then there are other tangential;
Battisti was tried in the context of these special laws to combat terrorism laws that greatly heightened the penalties if the offenses were in fact related subversion. Many argue therefore that the penalties were excessive in Battisti precisely because born in that context. But they seem excessive now. You must understand if they looked like when Aldo Moro was held prisoner in the hideout of the Red Brigades and there were those who called for the reintroduction of the sentence death (The Republicans, not just Missini.).
The short context counts.
And then again Spataro contends that Battisti was convicted serial killer because that's all.
to create more confusion then weighs the politicization of Baptists happened in prison, making him a common criminal who becomes "subversive politics" in a climate in which the "proletarian expropriation" was a act purely political act and the boundaries between delinquent and subversive gesture is made thin.
A figure then ideologically ambiguous to Baptists, like other prisoners or Segio Curcio, who still a confrontational interview with institutions engaged in some way.
Battisti, no, he just runs away. In his "The worst youth then Mughini dismisses it as" poor and the poor cock he jerks his fellow adventurers! A character like that, it goes without saying, is elected to a worse symbol of those years by many moderate intelligentsia.
Finally, I cite the arrogance of the French intellectuals who treat it as a "revolutionary" (their words) persecuted by the Italian Government. Adding confusion to confusion.

where I wanted to get there? I wanted to get to the fact that the story Battisti is very complicated, very opaque, with much food for thought.
But the current debate is not about the deeds and misdeeds.
but on opinions that any part of such political and cultural deeds and misdeeds.
And if someone tries hard to form your own idea, trying to access the sources, who else can not be unless the pleadings, (Of course, immersed in the historical context) here is that these sources are unavailable.
With all due respect the democracy of the network, which enables you to read cablegrams of a U.S. ambassador to Costa Rica but does not give me the decision process Battisti.
E 'which does not give anyone .... Neither advocates nor critics, committed as they are to use to its advantage, as the scribe stronzissimi modern, these valuable data.
So I can not write a post about each other Baptists.
I have to write a post about how those who have information in hand (the black gold of the network) is the story Battisti.
I have to surf between innocent and guilty, among pundits of the 70 year history, when everything was primitive magma, chaos, revolution and the upcoming trials "bourgeois farce" and justice-hard for which a sentence is like a diamond, transparent and scratch-resistant, which should be taken as it is. Manco had a reading of the Sibyl Cumana.

short, I understand that there are four (well 4) murder, which was judged accused, including Baptists.
Here, the two camps that have formed around each other, do not agree on anything and say anything about the role that Baptists had in these four murders.
This is because of my research, the state of affairs.
contrary opinions.


the searcher

Steam South Park On You Iphone

the disappearance of (mis)




know is curious.
uncomfortable I decided to write a post about each other Baptists.
Before doing so I tried to search the web for documentation of the material, given the confusion that reigns in this area.
What better than the record of the trial, for example?
From there it goes to the root of the story I thought and I can overtake the momentum of the positions which are defined as "ideological."
Well it's interesting, because I have not found.
I even found a page on the trial of Cesare Battisti true, the patriot, in 1916 complete with a death sentence, found here , out of curiosity, but the trial records to contemporary Baptists even the shadow.
There are many commentaries and glosses to the acts themselves.
Anyone following the story is more accurately without a doubt the site Carmilla.
here find the page that I could read more detail about the process.
Carmilla, however, is a site with a connotation politician / ideological very precise, thus leaves the doubt that you have selected the contradictions of the ruling for its own use.
Spataro instead (I think the PM process to Battisti) is guilty of excesses opposites. Make a portrait of the accused so hard that it makes me doubt some of its prevention are equally strong. It was a first line in the fight against the 70 armed subversion. Even then its a case could be tainted by a personal vision.
Then I see on television an interview with the butcher's son killed (one of the four murders of which he is accused Baptists) and I hear that Baptists recognized among the killers of his father. Wow, I think. It was therefore an eyewitness? I do not know why I can not find the record of the trial.
Torregiani son instead (Torregiani was the jewel of Milan, who was killed in one of the robberies discussed in the process) was affected in the fact by a stray bullet shot by his father, did you know?
According to Carmilla then, Battisti is indicated by two repentant gunman.
Here pentitismo assured at the time the reduction of sentences. Carmilla obviously insinuates that for this reason the two, already caught the blame on the only fugitive. This makes the evidence less reliable or not? Were removed during the process or have held?
I do not know again, why do not I find the acts of the process and I can not give me an idea of \u200b\u200bmine ...
Complicating the issue then there are other tangential;
Battisti was tried in the context of these special laws to combat terrorism laws that greatly heightened the penalties if the offenses were in fact related subversion. Many argue therefore that the penalties were excessive in Battisti precisely because born in that context. But they seem excessive now. You must understand if they looked like when Aldo Moro was held prisoner in the hideout of the Red Brigades and there were those who called for the reintroduction of the sentence death (The Republicans, not just Missini.).
The short context counts.
And then again Spataro contends that Battisti was convicted serial killer because that's all.
to create more confusion then weighs the politicization of Baptists happened in prison, making him a common criminal who becomes "subversive politics" in a climate in which the "proletarian expropriation" was a act purely political act and the boundaries between delinquent and subversive gesture is made thin.
A figure then ideologically ambiguous to Baptists, like other prisoners or Segio Curcio, who still a confrontational interview with institutions engaged in some way.
Battisti, no, he just runs away. In his "The worst youth then Mughini dismisses it as" poor and the poor cock he jerks his fellow adventurers! A character like that, it goes without saying, is elected to a worse symbol of those years by many moderate intelligentsia.
Finally, I cite the arrogance of the French intellectuals who treat it as a "revolutionary" (their words) persecuted by the Italian Government. Adding confusion to confusion.

where I wanted to get there? I wanted to get to the fact that the story Battisti is very complicated, very opaque, with much food for thought.
But the current debate is not about the deeds and misdeeds.
but on opinions that any part of such political and cultural deeds and misdeeds.
And if someone tries hard to form your own idea, trying to access the sources, who else can not be unless the pleadings, (Of course, immersed in the historical context) here is that these sources are unavailable.
With all due respect the democracy of the network, which enables you to read cablegrams of a U.S. ambassador to Costa Rica but does not give me the decision process Battisti.
E 'which does not give anyone .... Neither advocates nor critics, committed as they are to use to its advantage, as the scribe stronzissimi modern, these valuable data.
So I can not write a post about each other Baptists.
I have to write a post about how those who have information in hand (the black gold of the network) is the story Battisti.
I have to surf between innocent and guilty, among pundits of the 70 year history, when everything was primitive magma, chaos, revolution and the upcoming trials "bourgeois farce" and justice-hard for which a sentence is like a diamond, transparent and scratch-resistant, which should be taken as it is. Manco had a reading of the Sibyl Cumana.

short, I understand that there are four (well 4) murder, which was judged accused, including Baptists.
Here, the two camps that have formed around each other, do not agree on anything and say anything about the role that Baptists had in these four murders.
This is because of my research, the state of affairs.
contrary opinions.


the searcher