not easy to write on the transmission of Fazio / Saviano.
but a friend tells me that I write about television, and then do it.
later confessed that he saw the broadcast at times on you tube the next day, but I think I understand the spirit, style and structure
start from a particular .. The production house
come away with me is the Endemol. The same de Big Brother (Endemol is indeed the inventor of the format.)
Big Brother goes broadcast the same evening, is played by come away with me, which I think presents a historical share three rai.
So in summary, Endemol is present on the evening of 8 November on two competing networks, with two radically different programs, earn 21.5% with Fazio / Saviano and 18.4% with big brother. a total of about 40% of the share of that evening. Endemol
course structure was the "technical", it is clear that the content and style of the transmission are in the hands of its authors, but it is interesting to note how these plots, plots, generate productive mestizo influences that disrupt a lot of wars religion on TV
good vs. bad TV.
way, I speak of this. What I have seen born and grow up with a bit of discomfort is the feeling of battle won against the barbarians. The TV can be high, civil, engaged, educated and make big plays, not the GF that is ugly, dirty and bad.
Nothing could be more superficial.
Although I realize that the land is mined, again I would try to unravel the mechanisms that are strictly television and where content has to do tangentially.
"Come away with me" is a one time event. And as such it is experienced by viewers. And God forbid that do not share in the triumph.
We know there are only four episodes, we know, even if we say with modesty, that can listen whenever saviano be a unique opportunity for the conditions under which such a person is forced to live. The combined sense of uniqueness, of course, a high-quality content shows the transmission as a pleasure but also as a sort of duty "street" (and not by the merits of a country that is forced to convert a share of program television in a political declaration of intent ...)
Obviously the contents of the GF are different. I would not say either lower or higher, I'm really from another planet and human sociology, but we can not really compare the two in terms of share.
doing it because we can not ignore evidence of technical or television reception.
THE GF is an unknown program that airs for three months once a week and is carefully spread over the entire week of programming. Pills daily, round tables in the afternoon, direct web, gialappistiche parodies that ridiculed well sums it up (and broadcast) with it all week.
So is' a very traditional TV schedule keeps firmly that through the hard core audience and viewers that it was built.
and then the GF is a kind of appendix to the novel in installments ....
Characters like a soap opera, are outlined day by day, creating his own following, developing a mechanism of typhoid / or identification of rejection, to reach the zenith of the last episode, with those incredible footage of the winner that just wanders around the house.
symbolic meaning of national / popular powerful. A stranger who defeated other unknown becomes known, retains control of the area, he gained a lot of money and changes his life. Appendix novel and sports bar together. How can we compare it to a TV like that of Fazio? What journalistic, cultural, investigative? high note?
The fact that the GF has suffered a haemorrhage during the night Come away with me is a very good news but not the television revolution. It means then that very public civil, engaged, different, perhaps even sees big brother. Or not?
If you come away with me aired for three months (and not the nature of the program is that) we would see him become a TV show "normal" (pass me the term) and fall in its share physiologically natural, which I believe would be high, but not as high as the first evening. At that point, a reflection boobies many televisions as possible would be more interesting and more authentic. Instead, many seek to challenge
come away with me as a weapon for the alleged battles moralizing. I think it is wrong in absolute terms and even I do not think is beneficial to program, which can not be judged with a meter artistic / creative (and it would be interesting reflections to do) but it becomes a moral and political manifesto, and then perilously close to dogma.
It 's a good program? What is your rate? and content? you can turn it into a model of public television? and if so, how?
here are the questions that would be nice to do.
the searcher
0 comments:
Post a Comment